Difference between revisions of "Microgrant Process Review"

From Hackuarium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
===How to apply===
 
===How to apply===
 
Communicate on Slack
 
Communicate on Slack
 
description
 
details
 
quantity
 
 
3 members of the community have to accept
 
  
 
===How to review an application and vote===
 
===How to review an application and vote===

Revision as of 17:54, 9 March 2017

(Work in Progress)

Microgrant Process Review is a short project started by Shalf in his role as Board Member to propose and implement improvements to this important internal tool we have as an association to support and nurture great stuff.

20170308 Creating page, starting collecting past conversations about it 20170309 Vote upon proposal below at the Board Meeting

Proposal

State of the Microgrant Process

Why?

Projects that will benefit the community, supported by the community (partly)

How to apply

Communicate on Slack

How to review an application and vote

Not accepted or division of opinions? present it in an OpenHackuarium and vote by hand

How to announce results and follow-up with members applying

List of granted projects (not people) with a link to the project description on the wiki

Recommendations

the usual system with at least 2 members of board saying it is ok, after a presentation at an open hackuarium evening, seems fine to RA.

Why?

How to apply

How to review an application and vote

How to announce results and follow-up with members applying